Anti-Corruption Group Files Complaint vs. Ex-QC Rep. Bingbong Crisologo Following Admission of Alleged Fund Misuse

Anti-Corruption Group Files Complaint vs. Ex-QC Rep. Bingbong Crisologo Following Admission of Alleged Fund Misuse

An anti-corruption advocacy group has formally lodged a complaint against former Quezon City Representative Bingbong Crisologo with the Office of the Ombudsman and other oversight agencies, citing his recent admission of irregularities in the implementation of the Tulong Panghanapbuhay sa Ating Disadvantaged/Displaced Workers (TUPAD) program. The complaint accuses Crisologo of violating anti-graft and election laws, demanding accountability for the alleged diversion of public funds meant for marginalized workers.
 
This comes weeks after Crisologo publicly acknowledged "shortcomings" in managing TUPAD funds during his tenure, though he stopped short of admitting legal wrongdoing. The anti-corruption group argued that his statement, coupled with earlier evidence of "ghost beneficiaries" and politicized distribution, warrants a full investigation. They emphasized that taxpayer-funded programs like TUPAD must be shielded from exploitation for personal or political gain.
 
In their complaint, the group cited testimonies from alleged witnesses and discrepancies in payroll documents, claiming funds were channeled to individuals not qualified under the program’s guidelines. They also raised concerns over the timing of the disbursements, which reportedly coincided with Crisologo’s previous election campaigns.
 
Crisologo’s legal team dismissed the complaint as “recycled allegations” and reiterated that his earlier remarks referred to administrative oversights, not criminal acts. They emphasized his cooperation with investigators and commitment to clarifying the matter.
 
Public reaction has been mixed, with some sectors applauding the push for accountability, while others accuse the anti-corruption group of politicizing the issue. The Ombudsman and Commission on Audit (COA) have yet to confirm if a probe will be launched.
 
The controversy has reignited debates over transparency in social welfare programs, particularly as Crisologo remains active in local politics. Legal experts note that his admission, though carefully worded, could complicate his defense if evidence of intentional misuse is uncovered.

Post a Comment

0 Comments